OPINION= PA) (The “issue of qualified immunity is a legal determination that we review de novo.”) (citing cases).] MS. MONK: And we would have. Employment Employment Law – Sex Discrimination; Termination. 12/10/ Dennis v. OSRAM . Here are a few recent First Circuit decisions of interest: 1. Glik v. Cunniffe [http:// ?OPINION=PA]. Here, the.
|Published (Last):||1 January 2009|
|PDF File Size:||15.98 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.65 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Thread starter Twenty five ought six Start date Aug 31, Nikita Biddle June 27, at 6: Notify me of new comments via email. I am looking for the next Reagan. In our society, police officers are expected to endure significant burdens caused by citizens’ exercise of their First Amendment rights.
1st Cir. Court Appeals finds absolute 1st Amend. right to publicly record cops | GON Forum
Video cameras are becoming weapons. You are commenting using your Twitter account. The investigators discovered that she was recording them 10a she was arrested and charged with two counts of eavesdropping, Mr.
Nothing was done, then you look at the fbi for help as well, and they are just as bad.
Regular citizens are scared of the police because of the way they handle things. If only the government has the ability to record, we will fall into a new tyranny.
Every one of them was Muslim. Though Plaintiff held the cellphone in plain view and did not interfere with the arrest, the officers arrested Glik for violating the Massachusetts wiretap statute, Mass. Last July, the 01aa called the police and said he wanted Ms. If the cops are doing their jobs properly they should not care who takes a picture.
1st Cir. Court Appeals finds absolute 1st Amend. right to publicly record cops
By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use. Quoting from the New York Times:. Excerpt Read more at theagitator. But Glik sued for violations of his civil rights. Still, one of the officers talked to Ms.
Take action to support Tiawanda Moore! | Chicago Taskforce on Violence Against Girls & Young Women
01z must be logged in to reply to this topic. Finally, if you are anarchists, of whatever stripe, salutations, some of the 01q in your website is interesting and I enjoyed surfing through it.
I know that they have the power to harass and destroy lives and not have to be accountable for their actions. I will try to make it to your courtdates. You may hear this case come up from time to time and you should be familiar with it. The First Amendment issue here is, as the parties frame it, fairly narrow: But he added that the law contains a crucial exception.
The presence of probable cause was not even arguable here.
Officers and States Attorneys who use the power of position to intimidate, harass, incarcerate and ruin lives deserve special cell blocks and places in hell. I simply told him it was a subject that would be decided by the courts.
Basic First Amendment principles, along with case law from this and other circuits, answer that question unambiguously in the affirmative. It should always be legal to record public officials in the performance of their public duties.
The goal of action is to minimize the harms caused by the State. The Taskforce is asking our friends to take action in the case of Tiawanda Moore, a young woman in Chicago who has accused a police officer of sexual harassment, and has herself been charged with recording police officers on her Blackberry. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: US Court of Appeals decision last week. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here