Assad is back for good in Syria – and with Trump’s blessing | The Spectator
It is the third time Assad has visited Russia since the Syrian conflict broke out – underlining the strong relationship between the two leaders and. Why does Russia support Syria and Bashar al-Assad and who else is For a decade the two countries had a fairly solid relationship but. Yet it is not clear what room there is for close ties in Syria — other than Russia's backing of the government of President Bashar al-Assad of.
Syria is now, to all intents and purposes, a Russian protectorate. The Syrian rebels who spent so long begging for American help and arms can now expect to be entirely abandoned. As part of the de-escalation process, Trump is said to be eager to withdraw the 2, or so US special forces still stationed in Syria. And all in time for US midterm elections in November. Days before the Helsinki summit, Benjamin Netanyahu dropped his own diplomatic bombshell following yet another meeting with Putin in Moscow they have met at least nine times during the past 18 months.
Israel, he said, would have no problem working with an Assad regime in Syria in the future. This is despite his repeated calls for regime change, and the Israeli air force bombing military targets inside the country dozens of times over the past few years.
So why is Bibi now keen on Assad? Because his main concern is routing the Iranian forces who have been settling down in Syria — often with Russian connivance. If Russia would agree to this, Israel would be content to accept that Syria is under Russian management — and that the Kremlin has its own naval base on the Mediterranean.
Putin seems to have convinced Netanyahu that he would do everything in his power to see off the Iranians, and keep everyone far from the Israeli border. Given the almighty mess inside Syria, that is as much as Israel should reasonably expect of Putin in the short term.
And what do the Iranians get in return?
Russia news: Why Putin supports Syria and President Assad | Daily Star
Israel seems rather impatient for this new deal to begin, and has been bombing the bejesus out of Hezbollah and Iranian regime targets in Syria — even as the summit was convening.
No one in Moscow has said anything significant about them publicly.
Trump now has a new red line: And as for Assad? The President is now willing to look the other way. As comebacks go, this is rather extraordinary.
Assad has gone from being the focus of western ire —with the House of Commons even taking a vote on whether to bomb his army — to being there for good. As one seasoned Middle Eastern observer has drily noted, the West and its allies threw everything at him — but to no avail.
Assad is now the first Arab leader to survive an attempt at regime change coordinated by the West, Gulf Arabs and Israel since Egyptian strongman Gamal Abdul Nasser emerged unscathed from the Suez debacle back in Even his alleged use of chemical weapons — punished by Trump himself in a missile strike three months ago — has not derailed his campaign.
Quite something for a leader judged by the UN to have used chemical weapons as a routine weapon of war. Far more important for Assad is that, in the eyes of most of the Syrian people, he is a hero — and not least for having saved their bacon by wiping out Islamic State.
An annual survey of Arab public opinion published last week revealed that the US 84 per cent and Israel 90 per cent are still perceived by Arabs as the greatest threats to regional security, ahead of Syrian allies Iran and Russia. More to the point, according to the same survey an overwhelming majority of Arabs 81 per cent were also found to view US foreign policy towards Syria negatively.
No one is likely to congratulate Trump for having skilfully navigated the Syrian minefield. Assad has a better chance to resist than the opposition does to win, therefore Moscow is now simply betting on Assad.
Lavrov nonetheless stated, when asked if Russia was supporting the Assad government, that "we are not protecting any regime".
Why is Russia an ally of Syria? Why does Putin support President Assad?
The draft resolution also raised concern over "the illegal supply of weapons to the armed groups in Syria". Western diplomats initially referred to the proposed resolution as a basis for negotiations. Russia indicated that it would not agree to the Western-Arab draft in its current form,  and that it would continue to promote its own resolution in the Security Council. Additionally, the Russian delegation said that Syria alone held the power to change the fate of its people, without foreign intervention.
On 20 April, the Security Council announced an agreement to expand the number of U. Security Council on 21 Apriland deployed up to unarmed observers to Syria for a period of up to 90 days.
The plan also called for passage of the Annan peace plan, making unanimous passage of the resolution significant. After the peace plan was passed, Russian's U. Russia has also accused the West and allied nations of sabotaging a cease-fire brokered by Russia between Syrian forces.
The shelling was probably US selling weapons to Bahrain and at the same time criticizing Russia for supporting Syrian President Assad with weapons. Russia feels that the US is acting hypocritically by expecting them to discontinue selling weapons to the Syrian government, since the US supplies Syrian rebels with weapons via Turkey. From Russia's perspective, if US aids the Syrian opposition, they are indirectly, undermining Russia's national security.
BBC commented that Russia expects only one of two outcomes to take place in the Syrian civil war: He stated on Russian state media that: And the government of Syria should have felt that in due time and should have undertaken some reform.
Had they done that, what we're seeing in Syria today would have never happened.
Mikhail Bogdanov stated that: The base does not have any strategic military importance". There is a threat of their return to us.
So, instead of waiting for their return, we are helping President al-Assad fight them". We all know that after the end of the Cold Wara single center of domination emerged in the world.
We are all different.
Russian involvement in the Syrian Civil War
And we should respect that. No one has to conform to a single development model that someone has once and for all recognized as the only right one. Attempts to push for changes within other countries based on ideological preferences often led to tragic consequences and to degradation rather than progress. It seems however, that far from learning from others' mistakes, everyone just keeps repeating them.
And so the export of revolutions, this time of so-called "democratic" ones, continues.