The unhappy relationship of feminism and postmodernism in anthropology

Out in Theory: The Emergence of Lesbian and Gay – Ethnologies – Érudit

topic of the postmodernism in the current Social Anthropology. .. D. A. () “ The unhappy relationship of feminism and postmodernism in anthropology”. Under the influence of western feminism anthropology, domestic studies . “The Unhappy Relationship of Feminism and Postmodernism in Anthropology”. This article explores the relationship between feminism and postmodernism in anthropology through a reading of the Derek Freeman / Margaret Mead.

This article studies criticism and dilemmas encountered in the development of female anthropology, trying to clarify the origin of feminism and anthropology. The marginalization of anthropology of woman resulted from the complex relationships of mutual compatibility and exclusiveness between feminism and anthropology.

There were the non-male, non-western and non-feminist characteristics in the specific research. Under the influence of western feminism anthropology, domestic studies usually do not distinguish between anthropology of woman and feminism anthropology. For instance, Zhou Hong argues that anthropology of woman is also termed feminism anthropology in the West.

Liu Shifeng defines anthropology of woman as an organic whole of feminist theories and anthropology. This concept does not exclude male scholars and their relevant studies on women.

But for anthropological studies, it is difficult to conduct special research by transcending gender segregation, and relevant studies are rare.

However, studies on women by male scholars not only exert negligible influence in this field, but also frequently fall under criticism of female scholars, and hence, this paper will not make special discussions.

University of California Press,pp. University of Chicago Press, In sum, feminist political philosophy is a still evolving field of thought that has much to offer mainstream political philosophy.

In the past two decades it has come to exert a stronger influence over mainstream political theorizing, raising objections that mainstream philosophers have had to address, though not always very convincingly.

And in its newest developments it promises to go even further. Ackerly, Brooke, and Susan Okin, Cambridge University Press, pp. Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality. The Promise of Happiness, Durham: Living a Feminist Life. Race, Gender, and the Self, Oxford: The Politics of Our Selves: Melodrama and the Politics of Feeling, Durham: The New Mestiza, San Francisco: Aunt Lute Foundation Books. A Political Theory Anthology, Dayton: The Trouble with Unity: Latino Politics and the Creation of Identity, Oxford: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton: The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era, Princeton: A Philosophical Exchange, New York: Benhabib, Seyla, and Drucilla Cornell, On the Politics of Gender, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

A feminist Reading in Political Theory, Totowa: States of Injury, Princeton: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics, Princeton: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection, Stanford: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, J.

Butler, Judith, and Joan Wallach Scott, Feminists Theorize the Political, New York: Butler, Judith, and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Who Sings the Nation State? Language, Politics, Belonging, Calcutta: The Faces of Intellectual Disability: Carlson, Licia, and Eva Kittay, For More Than One Voice: Toward a Philosophy of Vocal Expression, Stanford: A Critique of Rectitude, Stanford: Collins, Patricia Hill, At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, and Equality, Princeton: Critchley, Simon, and Chantal Mouffe, Deconstruction and Pragmatism, London ; New York: Oxford University Press, pp.

Beyond God the Father: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism, Boston: Women, Race, and Class, New York: Freedom is a Constant Struggle, Chicago: Feminism After Identity Politics, Berkeley: University of California Press. Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics, Durham: Feminism, Arendt, and Politics, New York: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition, Princeton: The Dialectic of Sex: Garry, Ann, Serene J. Khader, and Alison Stone eds.

In a Different Voice: Globalizing Democracy and Human Rights, Cambridge: Feminism, Diasporas, Neoliberalism, Durham: Toward a Corporeal Feminism, Indianapolis: The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: The Trouble with Passion: The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom, Princeton: Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics, Ithaca: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Democracy and the Foreigner, Princeton: Paradox, Law, Democracy, Princeton: Honig, Bonnie, and David Mapel, Skepticism, Individuality, and Freedom: Black Women and Feminism, Boston: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric, 10 1: Speculum of the Other Woman, G. An Ethics of Sexual Difference, G.

I Love to You: Sketch of a Possible Felicity in History, A. The Emotional Politics of Racism: Pop Music, Feminism, Neoliberalism, London: Kittay, Eva Feder, Moral Sentiment and Democratic Deliberation, Princeton: Revolution in Poetic Language, M. Columbia University Press, pp.

The Man of Reason: Essays and Speeches, Berkeley: Laclau, Ernesto, and Chantal Mouffe, Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London: Wadsworth Publishing Company, pp. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, Cambridge: Malabou, Catherine, and Ewa P.

Maldonado Torres, Nelson, Views from the Underside of Modernity Durham: Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels, Democracy and the Political Unconscious, New York: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 22 4: Sexual Politics, 1st edition, Garden City, N. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity, Durham: Androcentric theories generate knowledge that embodies the assumptions of these theories and ignores the experiences and perspectives of women.

One of the tenets of feminist theorizing is that knowledge should be formulated from a broader base of experience. Thus, a new, more comprehensive, more all-encompassing knowledge is built up through feminist theorizing. Such theorizing seeks to provide a more complete representation of women's realities. As Sandra Harding expressed it, Knowledge is supposed to be based on experience, and the reason the feminist claims can turn out to be scientifically preferable is that they originate in, and are tested against, a more complete and less distorting kind of social experience.

Women's experiences, informed by feminist theory, provide a potential grounding for more complete and less distorted knowledge claims than do men's. Like others, feminist-standpoint theorists have their own assumptions. They assume there is an objective reality that can be made better if women's experiences and knowledges are added to mainstream or androcentric epistemologies.

Postmodernist-feminist theorizing supports the investigation of women's experiences and knowledges as a basis for creating new feminist-informed knowledges. This approach differs from feminist-standpoint theorizing in several ways.

Postmodernist-feminist theorists do not assume there is a complete, coherent reality to which women's experiences can be added; rather, they assume there are multiple realities and experiences. Postmodernist-feminist theorists see these experiences and their influence on the generation of knowledge as fluid, contingent, diverse, and historically and culturally specific. They do not argue that feminist claims are scientifically preferable, as they are more sceptical about the faith placed in rationality, objectivity, and science.

However, they support the position that knowledge claims should be formulated from a broader base of experience and should recognize that women's experiences will differ across race, class, culture, and sexual orientation. Thus, there are diverse feminist theoretical approaches. Although they converge on the core issue of women's subordination, they differ in their assumptions about the causes or sources of that subordination. These differences reflect the richness of women's lives and the need to integrate the experiences and knowledges of women in the South, as well as all women in the North, if we are to move toward a more inclusive, sensitive theorizing about both women's subordination and their power.

Hilary Rose's remarks in Box 6 illustrate some of the new thinking of feminists in the South and North. Box 6 Feminists using theory Staying Alive by Vandana Shiva is a marvellous example of the ways that feminists relate to theory, using it as a resource in the defence of both women and nature.

First the book is written from within a struggle of the Chipko women to defend the trees on which their lives depend.

While without the mass movement there would be no story, it is also a story in which her skills as a scientist are integral. Her account of the struggle is a story of transformation She makes solid technical arguments about what is happening to the land and the water.

Her training as a physicist — part of that universalistic highly abstract discourse so criticised by feminism — is both a crucial element within, and transformed by the struggle. She reports different ways of collecting data, organising in fresh ways, producing a holistic ecological knowledge specific to the locality and people. This careful rethinking of the environmental endemic generates a highly "situated and embodied knowledge" with strong claims to objectivity, out of the "universalistic and disembodied knowledge" of the physicist.

Nor are the activities she reports limited to new knowledge building, for she also describes and endorses essential myth making which historically has often given energy to social movements of the excluded but which unquestionably often makes their intellectual allies uneasy. Whereas Western feminists have mostly fought the notion that women are naturally nearer to nature, seeing that as a patriarchal cage, Shiva casts Indian peasant women and the myths they construct cast themselves in the role of the natural protectors of the forest.

Essentialism is used as a source of strength. It is a dangerous move yet the situation is already a matter of staying alive.

Feminist Political Philosophy

But the point I want to make is the extra-ordinarily divergent strands which Shiva weaves together. Nothing that can be made useful within a struggle is disregarded, she takes very different discourses and radically recycles them, adapting them with strength and imagination to political purposes. In Shiva I think we get something of a reply from a feminist scientist to Audre Lorde's question, can the master's tools be used to dismantle the master's house?

I think the reply goes something like this, providing we are prepared to select, to adapt, to use for hitherto unimagined purposes and weave them in with the entirely new, then yes, we can use the master's tools. But in the process it is crucial to understand that the tools are themselves transformed. As well as tearing down the master's house, that crucial preliminary act, a feminist science also begins to build anew, to construct a feminist science.

Chapter 4 will examine existing policies and those being developed, to illustrate how they reflect and satisfy the needs of women. Conclusion This chapter discusses theorizing as a process used to test assumptions about a number of phenomena in order to generate principles and theories to explain these phenomena. This chapter also points out that traditionally this process has been male centred and related to the cultures, nationalities, and dominant economic classes of the theorists, who did not take into account the perspectives and experiences of women or the problems and issues that affect women.

Postmodern feminism

Until feminist theorists began critiquing existing knowledges, these theories were used to produce programs and policies that adversely affected the lives of women.

The readings highlight the feminist challenges to the traditional, androcentric approach to theorizing and discuss some of the characteristics of feminist approaches. These approaches not only take into account differences in experiences of women and men but also recognize that women themselves do not constitute a homogenous group.

Using these approaches, feminists have deconstructed androcentric theories and knowledge and produced a comprehensive view of women's multiple realities. The knowledges they have generated provide a basis for critiquing existing policies and determining alternative policies and activities to address the problems affecting women.

Recognizing that factors such as class, race, ethnicity, age, social status, and sexual orientation shape perceptions and experience points to the social character of gender and gender relations. In the next chapter, you will examine a number of theories on gender and development that have evolved from a process of both women's and men's theorizing in different contexts and situations.

Is there an international feminism? Alternative Approach 24 Summer Women in Third World development. Concepts in feminist theory: Is there a feminist method?

History and dilemma: the troubled western anthropology of woman

Curriculum — foundations, principles and issues. Alternative knowledge systems in science: Suggested reading Harding, S. Talking back — thinking feminism, thinking black. Feminist method and qualitative research about mid-life.

Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, Zed Press, London, UK. It also provides an explanation of the precolonial experience of so-called Third World people, especially with respect to gender relations and the experiences of women and men in social, political, and economic life. The discussion challenges simplistic characterizations and generalizations of precolonial societies and points to their rich diversity and difference.

This chapter provides a framework for considering alternative ways of perceiving human social and cultural development and organizing social, economic, and political life. It also provides information that challenges traditional monolithic assumptions about women and the sexual division of labour. Objectives The objectives of this chapter are the following: To explore the evolution of the concepts of gender and development and to critically examine their underlying assumptions; To recognize the diversity of human experience and the alternative measures of value and standards for the assessment of progress and human achievement; and To provide a general historical understanding of the lives of Third World people before the institutionalization of development.

In ordinary usage, development a noun derived from the verb develop implies movement from one level to another, usually with some increase in size, number, or quality of some sort. In the Penguin English Dictionary, the verb develop means "to unfold, bring out latent powers of; expand; strengthen; spread; grow; evolve; become more mature; show by degrees; explain more fully; elaborate; exploit the potentialities of a site by building, mining, etc.

For our purposes, these meanings of development apply to human societies. The usage of the word in this context was popularized in the post-World War n period to describe the process through which countries and societies outside North America and Europe many of them former colonial territories were to be transformed into modern, developed nations from what their colonizers saw as backward, primitive, underdeveloped societies see Box 1.

Box 1 Colonialism Colonialism refers in general to the extension of the power of a state through the acquisition, usually by conquest, of other territories; the subjugation of the inhabitants to a rule imposed by force; and the financial and economic exploitation of the inhabitants to the advantage of the colonial power. Characteristic of this form was the maintenance of a sharp and fundamental distinction often expressed in law as well as in fact between the ruling nation and the subordinate colonial populations.

This led to entrenched forms of racism.