Wikileaks and wikipedia relationship

Mailbag: Is Wikipedia related to WikiLeaks in any way? No. – Wikimedia Blog

wikileaks and wikipedia relationship

WikiLeaks has been in the news lately between – because they released a corpus of documents that consists over reports covering the war. While WikiLeaks fights to stay a step ahead of the CIA, Wikipedia, to make The Guardian sustainable by deepening our relationship with our. What's the difference between WikiLeaks and Wikipedia? WikiLeaks is not associated with Wikipedia. They are both different websites with different objectives.

The company further explained: For example, our terms of service state that 'you represent and warrant that you own or otherwise control all of the rights to the content While the court in Lille immediately refused to force OVH to deactivate the WikiLeaks website, the court in Paris stated it would need more time to examine the complex technical issue. Despite that, EasyDNS upon request of a customer who was setting up new WikiLeaks hosting began providing WikiLeaks with DNS service on "two 'battle hardened' servers" to protect the quality of service for its other customers.

Assange stated this was part of an attempt to take the voluntary effort typically seen in "Wiki" projects, and "redirect it to The "about" page originally read: Anybody can post to it, anybody can edit it. No technical knowledge is required. Leakers can post documents anonymously and untraceably. Users can publicly discuss documents and analyse their credibility and veracity.

Difference Between Wikileaks and Wikipedia

Users can discuss interpretations and context and collaboratively formulate collective publications. Users can read and write explanatory articles on leaks along with background material and context. The political relevance of documents and their verisimilitude will be revealed by a cast of thousands. However, WikiLeaks established an editorial policy that accepted only documents that were "of political, diplomatic, historical or ethical interest" and excluded "material that is already publicly available".

Now, submissions to WikiLeaks are reviewed by anonymous WikiLeaks reviewers, and documents that do not meet the editorial criteria are rejected. Bythe revised FAQ stated: Assange considers WikiLeaks a protection intermediary.

Rather than leaking directly to the press, and fearing exposure and retribution, whistleblowers can leak to WikiLeaks, which then leaks to the press for them. The group located its headquarters in Sweden because it has one of the world's strongest laws to protect confidential source-journalist relationships. Vopper have established previously that the American Constitution protects the re-publication of illegally gained information provided the publishers did not themselves violate any laws in acquiring it.

The Chagos islanders argued that the document showed the UK's motive for setting up a marine park on their territory was improper, but it had been excluded from proceedings earlier in the case. During this decision, the leaked document was said to not meet the criteria necessary to help the Chagos Refugee Group recover their homeland.

Its main financing methods include conventional bank transfers and online payment systems.

wikileaks and wikipedia relationship

According to Assange, WikiLeaks' lawyers often work pro bono. Assange has said that in some cases legal aid has been donated by media organisations such as the Associated Pressthe Los Angeles Timesand the National Newspaper Publishers Association.

  • Wikipedia:WikiLeaks is not part of Wikipedia
  • Not much love lost between Wikipedia and WikiLeaks

In Julythe Foundation stated that WikiLeaks was not receiving any money for personnel costs, only for hardware, travelling and bandwidth. As a charity accountable under German law, donations for WikiLeaks can be made to the foundation.

Funds are held in escrow and are given to WikiLeaks after the whistleblower website files an application containing a statement with proof of payment. The foundation does not pay any sort of salary nor give any renumeration [ sic ] to WikiLeaks' personnel, corroborating the statement of the site's former German representative Daniel Schmitt [real name Daniel Domscheit-Berg ] [] on national television that all personnel works voluntarily, even its speakers.

WikiLeaks said that this had happened before, and was done for "no obvious reason". Knight Foundation[30] but did not make the final approval. Leewho has done PR work for WikiLeaks with the press and on social networking websites.

A news anchor also mixed them up. We are not related. As a c 3the Wikimedia Foundation does not support or oppose political candidates. What are you doing to make sure Wikipedia stays neutral? The Wikimedia Foundation does not create or curate the contents of Wikipedia or the other educational sites we manage; instead, this work is done by a vast community of volunteers.

Difference Between Wikileaks and Wikipedia | Difference Between | Wikileaks vs Wikipedia

The crowdsourced work of tens of thousands of editors helps to check and balance Wikipedia. Content is not created, reviewed or controlled by a central authority, but rather by anyone from the public who is interested in joining in to spread knowledge.

Those tens of thousands of editors make updates of all kinds—including checks and balances on subjectivity—continuously Wikipedia is edited, on average, — times a minute. This community of editors holds neutrality as one of its main ideals.

All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view NPOVwhich means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. These policies jointly determine the type and quality of material that is acceptable in Wikipedia articles, and, because they work in harmony, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another.

Editors are strongly encouraged to familiarize themselves with all three.

wikileaks and wikipedia relationship

This policy is non-negotiable, and the principles upon which it is based cannot be superseded by other policies or guidelines, nor by editor consensus.

We build and operate technology to make sure Wikipedia is available to everyone, everywhere, across devices, and in nearly languages.