List of United States presidential candidates - Wikipedia
“If we ran an independent race, I honestly could see us beating both of them,” he said, referring to Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump. Sept. Walker. Real Questions for Presidential Candidates this type of thinking, and it resonated with many people in the US. Meet us on the commons. And who couldn't love a guy who's brought us all the popular pieces of the Magic Kingdom for so long? The answer could be the voters. It's not.
Real Questions for Presidential Candidates Here's what really needs to be debated in the coming election By Ask the Climate Question under a Creative Commons license What do you see as major issues eroding the common good in our country and what would you do about these issues? About Ruth Wilson Dr. Ruth Wilson worked as an educator for over 30 years and now devotes her time to writing and consulting.Meet the 2016 Presidential Candidates
The focus of her work is on education, the environment, and spirituality. Now with election season fast approaching, it may be time to consider some new questions. Many people seem to think and vote primarily in relation to how an issue, event, trend, or proposed policy impacts them individually. Thinking based on self-interest is not new.
I grew up in a farming community where discussions at election time focused on how positions taken by political parties and presidential candidates would impact farmers and their families.
I knew there were other major issues facing our nation but these seemed to have little or no impact on how the people in our community would cast their vote. Their focus was on how the outcomes of the election would benefit them personally. There was little talk about the common good or even the good of the country.
Real Questions for Presidential Candidates | On the Commons
We live in an individualistic society where the needs and interests of the individual are promoted over the needs of the group as a whole. A more cooperative, collaborative society, on the other hand, would focus more on what is good for the group.
Both tasks require a candidate to perform well under pressure, communicate effectively, and build a team that trusts you and can function with little sleep and lots of stress.
But if good campaigners made good presidents, we'd have a constant string of successes. Most sitting presidents, almost by definition, have been skilled on the campaign trail. Yet the talents do not necessarily convey. Lyndon Johnson crushed Barry Goldwater in in part because of his attention to the minutia of the contest. He carried a laminated card in his pocket of the key polls in each battleground statebut Vietnam was beyond his ability to micromanage.
Nixon and his men brought modern public relations techniques to the presidency in As president, he trampled on the office. InJimmy Carter was such a political unknown that no one on the game show What's My Line recognized him.
- List of United States presidential candidates
- Real Questions for Presidential Candidates
Two years later he was president. But he was also one of our least effective presidents. Advertisement Campaigns reward fighters. Governing requires cooperation, compromise, and negotiation.
Campaigns focus on one opponent, but a president, even if he wants to go on the attack, never has just one jaw to swing at. It was easier to slug John McCain again and again. Presidential campaigns are fantastical places. Here, on the campaign stump, the United States can be ruthless with China diplomatically—but not beholden to Beijing as creditors.
US election 2016: Meet the candidates
Entitlements are always safe—even as the deficit is drastically cut. Candidates build an electoral coalition by papering over differences and offending no one. Then, as president, they are forced to make choices which almost always offend some wing of the coalition they built.
Candidates are only one thing or its opposite. A candidate is either a leader or a ponderous professor, a man of the people or an elitist, the real deal or a phony. One-dimensional characterizations makes for easy political attacks and self-satisfaction among those who simply want to affirm their existing ideologies.
It is the laziness underpinning much talk radio, but it misses the essential paradox of the presidency: The cheap political critique of Mitt Romney is that he flip-flops. But malleability is a necessary quality in a president. Constancy has a nice romantic ring to it, but does anyone want a leader who sets a course and then refuses to change it no matter what?
Advertisement You can test presidential candidates by measuring them against the current occupant.
Or you can hold them up against an idealized version and see how they do. Mitt Romney promises to repeal the Affordable Care Act and replace it with an alternative. The Democrats might still control the Senate. That means Romney will need considerable skill working with the other party to get what he wants.
What experience in his background gives us confidence that he'll have the tools for the job he assigns himself? How will he manage that and take on repealing health care? That raises questions about his priorities and how he sets them. Is he a pragmatist?
Or is he an ideologue? Does he have the perseverance to handle both jobs?
How To Measure for a President
Maybe there is a better way to evaluate our presidential candidates, and come to more reliable conclusions about which ones are likely to have the skills actually required for the job. Al Gore once suggested that running for president was like a job interview.
But suppose the current presidential campaign were an extended job interview, conducted by the American people. Candidates are so guarded, the hiring committee would have little to go on.
He speaks a great deal but says so little. All I really know is that he loves this company and thinks its best days are ahead of it. He thinks the head office in D.
No applicant would ever get a job giving the vague answers our candidates do. The usual proposed remedy for the sorry state of our presidential campaigns is more focus on the issues. He has to have the skill necessary to follow through on his promises and translate his position into policy.
Advertisement Another idea for improving campaigns is to focus more on the character of candidates, which may get us closer to understanding how they would operate in the Oval Office. What if we approached presidential campaigns the way a large corporation approaches its search for a new chief executive?
The purpose of the campaign would be to test for the skills and attributes actually required for the job.