71 vehicles earn honors from IIHS
Cars and SUVs with the Best Safety Ratings . Among midsize SUVs, the Nissan Murano and Toyota Highlander were TSP+ Any Subaru model equipped with EyeSight technology would meet those requirements. To find the safest used SUVs, we assessed crash-test results from and and a 5-star overall rating from NHTSA from through Shoppers seeking a 3-row SUV or crossover with plenty of practicality and a . and the efforts of automakers to meet these organizations' increasingly tough standards. Warning systems that meet the National Highway Traffic Safety crash avoidance ratings under new test program: 7 midsize vehicles earn top Previously, the small SUV earned a marginal rating when it was tested in
The beefed-up side frame ties into the main frame rail, producing an additional load path for energy absorption.
On the Prius v, the front bumper was extended and the door frame strengthened. In addition, structure was added to better tie the door-hinge pillar to the frame rail.
Sport utility vehicle
In total, there are 27 superior-rated models and 33 with an advanced rating. However, when not equipped, they still meet the crashworthiness criteria for Top Safety Pick.
Currently only three automakers offer standard front crash prevention systems. Volvo models have standard City Safety, a low-speed autobrake system. The Mercedes-Benz C-Class and E-Class have a warning and autobrake system, but the standard autobrake components haven't been tested yet. All these vehicles are available with optional systems that earn higher ratings than the standard equipment. The CLA, which earns an advanced rating with its optional system, hasn't been tested for crashworthiness.
Kia Sedona is 2nd minivan to rate good in small overlap test When the Institute released small overlap results for minivans in November, the results were disappointing, with three models performing poorly see " Minivans with a major flaw: At that time, the Honda Odyssey was the only minivan to earn a good rating in the test. Now the Kia Sedona joins the Odyssey at the top of the list. The Sedona was tested twice, and the good rating is based on the second test.
RHV CARFAX - véhicules importés des USA
In the first test, the vehicle didn't perform well because the driver door opened. Doors should remain closed in a crash because an open door increases the risk of ejection.
In the Sedona's case, the door also performs an important structural function, so the level of crush ended up being much worse than it would have been had the door remained closed.
The doors of most late-model vehicles automatically lock when the vehicle is in gear or reaches a certain speed. In some cases, the feature can be disabled by the consumer. For those vehicles, the Institute's policy is to unlock the doors for the test. After the Sedona's first test, Kia told IIHS that the door-locking function would be changed so that consumers could no longer turn it off. Sedonas built after November have the new setting, and the company is planning a service campaign to change this on earlier Sedonas.
In light of the change, IIHS conducted the second test with the doors locked. This time all doors remained closed, resulting in the good rating. The new Sedona is a Top Safety Pick winner, with good ratings in all the other crashworthiness tests, including roof strength.
The previous generation had poor roof strength.
Sport utility vehicle - Wikipedia
However, the Jeep CJ models remained open-bodied and initially did not offer doors from the factory. Doors and hard roofs were not even factory optional equipment untilwhen the Jeep CJ-7 was launched. Land Rover initially offered a coach-built short station wagon body inbut it was expensive and sold fewer than units.
A more affordable closed metal body wasn't launched untilwhen a inch 2.
The first generations of the later International Harvester Scout 80 and the Ford Bronco were also shorter than 4-metre, two-door, off-road-focused vehicles. Although they sported more sophisticated body designs, a rear seat was not available in the Scout untiland the rear seat was initially optional equipment in both brands. Longer cars — 4WD carry-alls and LWB Jeeps and Land Rovers[ edit ] The earliest examples of longer-wheelbase, civilian, wagon-type SUVs using the term retrospectively were truck-framed station wagons and carry-alls, to which four-wheel drive was added — first of all the Willys Jeep Station Wagonlaunched a year before its Jeep Truck sibling.
Though Willys sold it as a "Jeep", it wasn't offered with four-wheel drive until On none of these early, longer vehicles was it obvious to have four side doors. Only on the long wheelbase Land Rover were four side doors a normal version. The Russian GAZproduced in small numbers fromcombined a 4-door closed steel sedan body with an off-roader's chassis and drive-train but had no rear hatch, tailgate, or doors, and was only for Red Army officers.
Automotive writers and journalists have offered various opinions about what was the "first true SUV".
Acheter des véhicules américains d’occasion ?
A vehicle often considered is the Willys Jeep Station Wagon designed by Brooks Stevens, which was first offered with 4-wheel drive in Car manufacturers evaded the regulation by selling SUVs as work vehicles. Consequently, modern SUVs are available with luxury vehicle features, and some crossover models adopt lower ride heights to accommodate on-road driving. The higher cost of labor in the U. Full-size SUVs often offered features such as three-row seating to effectively replace full-size station wagons and minivans.
Wagons were seen as old-fashioned. Additionally, full-size SUVs have greater towing capabilities than conventional cars, and can haul trailerstravel trailers caravans and boats. Increased ground clearance is useful in climates with heavy snowfall.
The very low oil prices of the s helped keep down running costs. The SUV was one of the most popular choices of vehicle for female drivers in the U. In Australia, SUV sales were helped by the fact that SUVs had much lower import duty than passenger cars did, so that they cost less than similarly equipped imported sedans.
The Big Three were slower to adapt than their Japanese rivals in producing small cars to meet growing demand due to inflexible manufacturing facilities, which made it unprofitable to build small cars. Market dominance[ edit ] Starting insales of SUVs started dominating the industry.