Not much love lost between Wikipedia and WikiLeaks | Business | The Guardian
What's the difference between WikiLeaks and Wikipedia? WikiLeaks is not associated with Wikipedia. They are both URL, jingle-bells.info, wikipedia. org. Wikileaks' information is not going to be derived from Wikipedia, though it is . Wikileaks has very little relation to the concept of a wiki, much less to Wikipedia. While WikiLeaks fights to stay a step ahead of the CIA, Wikipedia, to try to make The Guardian sustainable by deepening our relationship with.
Even those who mean well often do not have the experience or expertise to advise properly. This includes other media organisations. Act normal If you are a high-risk source, avoid saying anything or doing anything after submitting which might promote suspicion. In particular, you should try to stick to your normal routine and behaviour.
Wikipedia:WikiLeaks is not part of Wikipedia - Wikipedia
Remove traces of your submission If you are a high-risk source and the computer you prepared your submission on, or uploaded it from, could subsequently be audited in an investigation, we recommend that you format and dispose of the computer hard drive and any other storage media you used. In particular, hard drives retain data after formatting which may be visible to a digital forensics team and flash media USB sticks, memory cards and SSD drives retain data even after a secure erasure.
If you used flash media to store sensitive data, it is important to destroy the media.
If you do this and are a high-risk source you should make sure there are no traces of the clean-up, since such traces themselves may draw suspicion. If you face legal action If a legal action is brought against you as a result of your submission, there are organisations that may help you.
The Courage Foundation is an international organisation dedicated to the protection of journalistic sources. You can find more details at https: Submit documents to WikiLeaks WikiLeaks publishes documents of political or historical importance that are censored or otherwise suppressed. We specialise in strategic global publishing and large archives.
Wikipedia:WikiLeaks is not part of Wikipedia
The following is the address of our secure site where you can anonymously upload your documents to WikiLeaks editors. You can only access this submissions system through Tor.Top 5 WikiLeaks exposures
See our Tor tab for more information. A member of Congress confused Wikipedia and WikiLeaks in a televised interview, prompting many news stories about the mistake.
A news anchor also mixed them up. We are not related. As a c 3the Wikimedia Foundation does not support or oppose political candidates.
Mailbag: Is Wikipedia related to WikiLeaks in any way? No. – Wikimedia Blog
What are you doing to make sure Wikipedia stays neutral? The Wikimedia Foundation does not create or curate the contents of Wikipedia or the other educational sites we manage; instead, this work is done by a vast community of volunteers.
The crowdsourced work of tens of thousands of editors helps to check and balance Wikipedia. Content is not created, reviewed or controlled by a central authority, but rather by anyone from the public who is interested in joining in to spread knowledge.
Those tens of thousands of editors make updates of all kinds—including checks and balances on subjectivity—continuously Wikipedia is edited, on average, — times a minute. This community of editors holds neutrality as one of its main ideals. All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view NPOVwhich means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic.
Not much love lost between Wikipedia and WikiLeaks
These policies jointly determine the type and quality of material that is acceptable in Wikipedia articles, and, because they work in harmony, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another. Editors are strongly encouraged to familiarize themselves with all three.
This policy is non-negotiable, and the principles upon which it is based cannot be superseded by other policies or guidelines, nor by editor consensus.